Is Creatine Good For The Brain?

Creatine And Energy Metabolism

Author: Dr. Stephen Chaney

Creatine has developed a reputation as the “go to” supplement for athletes.

  • In a recent survey of NCAA Division I athletes, 48% of male athletes use creatine on a regular basis.
  • Over 80% of professional athletes in power sports like football use it.

But you may have seen recent reports that creatine is also good for the brain. You may be wondering:

  • Are those reports true?
  • If you are not an athlete, should you be taking creatine for a healthy brain?
  • If so, how much should you be taking?
  • Is regular creatine use safe?

I will review a couple of recent studies and answer these questions below. But first, it is time for my favorite topic: Metabolism 101. This week’s Metabolism 101 topic is, “Creatine And Energy Metabolism”.

Metabolism 101: Creatine And Energy Metabolism

Energy Metabolism: Before discussing the role of creatine in the body, I should start at the beginning by describing the basics of energy metabolism in our body. As you have probably heard, ATP is the energy currency of the cell.

Our cells generate energy in two ways:

  • Anaerobic (without oxygen) metabolism can generate ATP quickly but can only sustain high-intensity work for a few minutes.
  • Aerobic (with oxygen) metabolism requires oxygen and organelles called mitochondria to generate ATP. Aerobic metabolism can provide enough ATP to sustain moderate to low intensity work for hours.

Our cells don’t store ATP. They use it as fast as it is produced to:

  • Synthesize protein and many other components of the cell.
  • Synthesize DNA and fuel cell division.
  • Repair and regenerate cell membranes and cellular organelles.
  • Pump nutrients in and out of the cells and transport them to where they are needed within the cell.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Thousands of cellular reactions require ATP.

The Role Of Creatine In Cellular Energy Metabolism: Let’s start with the basics:

We can think of creatine as an energy bank.

  • When the cell has plenty of ATP, it makes a deposit into its energy bank by converting creatine into creatine-phosphate.
  • When the cell needs energy quickly it makes a withdrawal from its energy by converting creatine phosphate to creatine and generating ATP.

Creatine is found primarily in high energy tissues (muscle, brain, and testes) – No, I’m not going to talk about creatine and fertility today.

Every time the creatine-creatine-phosphate cycle occurs in high energy tissues, a small amount of creatine is converted to creatinine and filtered through the kidneys. There are two important consequences of this fact:

#1: The faster the phosphocreatine/creatine cycle turns, the more rapidly creatine will be converted to creatinine and drained from the body.

#2: Our body needs to constantly replenish its creatine stores. It does this in two ways:

  • Creatine is synthesized by the liver, kidneys, and pancreas. But it is not stored there. It is released into the bloodstream for use by high energy tissues. It is also synthesized by the brain. But creatine synthesized in the brain can only be used by the brain. It is not released into the bloodstream.
  • Creatine can come from muscle-containing foods – primarily red meat, chicken, and fish. Plant foods provide no creatine.
  • Creatine can also come from supplements – the topic of this article.
  • High-energy tissues have transporters that allow them to take up creatine from the bloodstream.

Creatine plays slightly different roles in muscle and brain.

Creatine Supplementation For Optimizing Muscle Function

Creatine in the muscle is primarily used for high-intensity short duration exercise. In muscle you can think of creatine as being used to “jump-start” high intensity exercise.

  • It takes a few seconds for anaerobic metabolism to go into overdrive. Creatine-phosphate stores fill that gap.
  • Muscle creatine-phosphate stores can fuel high-intensity exercise for 8-15 seconds (average = 10 seconds).

Creatine supplementation is well accepted for sports requiring short, intense bursts of power, speed, and strength, such as football, basketball, hockey, soccer, wrestling, bodybuilding, and sprinting. It is supported by dozens of published clinical studies.

The rationale is not hard to understand.

  • Muscle normally contains enough creatine-phosphate to support around 10 seconds of high-intensity exercise.
  • Creatine-phosphate supplementation increases muscle creatine stores by 20-40%. That supports another 2-4 seconds of exercise.
  • That may not sound like much. But anaerobic metabolism does not kick in until creatine-phosphate stores are exhausted, so the total amount of high-intensity power attained during each rep of a workout is increased by 2-4 seconds.
  • Over a period of weeks or months that extra 2-4 seconds of high intensity exercise during each rep of training translates into real gains in lean muscle mass, muscle strength, and exercise performance.
  • Of course, creatine supplementation provides little benefit for athletes involved in endurance sports.

Here are some other notable points about creatine supplementation for athletes:

  • Creatine supplementation benefits most athletes involved in high-intensity sports, but it appears to be particularly useful for vegans and vegetarians who may not be getting creatine from their diet.
  • Clinical studies and real-life experience have shown that creatine is safe when used properly. (I will discuss mild side effects and cautions below).
  • The doses used most frequently are:
    • Around 20 grams/day for quick results. For optimal absorption, it is best to divide it into 4 daily servings of 5 grams.
    • Around 5 grams/day for maintenance and for general use.
    • The eventual amount of muscle creatine is the same with 20- and 5-gram doses. The only difference is the speed at which optimal creatine levels are attained.
  • Creatine is best utilized when taken with food or smoothies containing both carbohydrate and protein.
  • Adequate hydration is important (more about that below).

Creatine Supplementation And Brain Health

Brain HealthBrain is different from muscle in that it depends on aerobic metabolism and is always using ATP at a high rate. Brain accounts for 20% of our body’s energy demand. In brain we can think of creatine as a buffer or reserve.

  • Brain creatine-phosphate stores are used in situations where the brain needs to increase its energy use over baseline (more about that below).

The initial excitement about creatine supplementation optimizing brain health came from mouse studies. However, we need to remember that mice aren’t humans. In this case the difference is clear.

  • Creatine supplementation increases brain creatine levels by 50% in mice, but only around 5-10% on average in humans.

So, it is not clear whether the results obtained with mice also apply to humans. The results of clinical trials with humans are mixed. They are promising, but not definitive.

Is Creatine Good For The Brain?

To answer that question I will share two recent reports with you as examples of where the creatine and brain health hypothesis stands at present.

Study #1: Creatine Supplementation And Alzheimer’s Disease.

Memory loss due to Dementia and Alzheimer’s disease with the medical icon of a tree in the shape of a human head and brain losing leaves.

This study (AN Smith et al, Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11270101, 2025) was designed to test the hypothesis that creatine supplementation might be beneficial for Alzheimer’s patients. It was a pilot study – designed to determine whether there was enough evidence to justify a larger clinical trial.

How Was This Study Done? Twenty participants, 60-90 years old (average = 73), were enrolled in this study. They had been previously diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and had been taking Alzheimer’s medication for at least 30 days. Each participant had a partner (spouse, family member, or friend) to support them and aid in accurate participation and reporting.

  • Participants consumed 20 grams of creatine, split into two 10-gram doses for 8 weeks.
    • Participants and their partners were given compliance trackers with two boxes to be checked each day to measure adherence to the supplementation protocol. Adherence was 90%.
  • Blood creatine levels were measured at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks as another measure of adherence.
  • Two measures of cognitive health were administered at baseline and at 8 weeks.
    • MMSE (a 30-item cognitive test).
    • The NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery, which measures attention, category switching, episodic memory, working memory, speed of processing, written language, and auditory language.
  • Brain creatine levels were measured using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopic imaging.

What Did The Study Show?Question Mark

  • Participants and their partners reported 13 incidences of mild side effects, which included cramping/muscle pain, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, facial flushing, and sleep disturbances.
  • Blood creatine levels increased 23-fold in 4 weeks and remained elevated at 8 weeks.
  • Brain creatine levels increased by 11% at 8 weeks.
  • When assessed with the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery, creatine supplementation (20 grams/day) improved:
    • Total cognition by 4%.
    • Fluid cognition by 7%.
    • List sorting working memory by 11%.
    • Oral reading recognition by 5%.
    • Attention by 7%.
  • There were no significant changes in the 5 other cognition categories in the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery.

The authors concluded, “Our study provides the first evidence in humans that creatine supplementation is feasible and may increase brain creatine and offer cognitive benefits to patients with Alzheimer’s Disease.”

These results are preliminary and suggest that future efficacy trials comparing creatine to placebo are needed to generate evidence that can be compared to other Alzheimer’s Disease clinical trials.”

“Should creatine provide benefit, the public health implications may be substantial given Alzheimer’s Disease cases are anticipated to rise and creatine is cost-effective with a good safety profile.”

Why Did I Include This Study? You may be wondering why I included such a preliminary study in my review. The answer is simple: It provides a graphical view of individual variability.

Every study mentions individual variability, but because this study has only 20 participants, the authors were able to graphically show the response of every individual in the study. And the results were informative.

  • In terms of brain creatine levels:
    • Some individuals had increases in the 25-30% range.
    • Others had increases of around 2-5%.
  • Similar variability was seen with each individual measure of cognition.

However, the most interesting result was that several measures of cognition were highly correlated with the changes in brain creatine levels. This suggests that the limiting factor in the brain health benefits of creatine may be the ability of creatine supplementation to influence brain creatine levels.

Study #2: Creatine Supplementation And Brain Health.

This study (H Roschel et al, Nutrients, 13, 586, 2021) is a review of 16 studies looking at the effect of creatine supplementation on various aspects of brain health.

  • All the studies were small.
  • They used different measures of cognitive health.
  • Most of the studies were short (2-15 days).
  • They used different measures of brain creatine levels (Creatine levels vary according to the region of the brain that is scanned).

While emphasizing the weaknesses and inconsistencies of published studies, the authors said:

  • “Creatine supplementation may positively influence some aspects of cognition under stressful conditions such as:
    • Hypoxia (reduced oxygen flow to the brain caused by chronic conditions like atherosclerotic narrowing of the carotid arteries, asthma, and COPD.
    • Sleep deprivation, especially when combined with exercise.”
  • They also discussed the theory that creatine supplementation may be beneficial for conditions associated with reduced brain creatinine levels such as:
    • Alzheimer’s disease, cognitive decline in general, mild traumatic brain injury, and depression.

They put particular emphasis on the potential benefits of creatine supplementation for mild traumatic brain injury, saying:

“Collectively, despite limited data, creatine supplementation seems potentially beneficial in reducing severity of or enhancing recovery from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), warranting further studies on its role not only as a post-injury therapy but also as a neuroprotective agent in populations at high risk of mTBI”

“Encouraging supplementation to reduce damage from or enhance recovery from mTBI…would ordinarily be considered premature. However, in this instance, given the devastating effects of mTBI, combined with the large body of safety and efficacy creatine supplementation data, encouraging supplementation for populations who are at high risk for mTBI might be considered more prudent.”

Finally, the authors concluded,

“There is a potential for creatine supplementation to improve cognitive processing, especially in conditions characterized by brain creatine deficits, which could be induced by acute stressors (e.g., exercise, sleep deprivation) or chronic, pathologic conditions (e.g., mTBI, cognitive decline, Alzheimer’s disease, depression).”

What Does This Study Mean For You?

Questioning WomanIf you are interested in creatine to support any kind of high intensity, short duration activity, the data are clear. Creatine supplementation in the 5-20 gm/day range with adequate hydration is both safe and effective.

Creatine offers little benefit for endurance events. But if you engage in any kind of high intensity training to build muscle mass in preparation for endurance events, creatine is likely to be of benefit.

However, we are at the early stages of understanding the effects of creatine supplementation on brain health and cognitive function. Most of the results are promising, but preliminary.

Here is a brief summary:

  • The effectiveness of creatine supplementation at increasing brain creatine levels and improving brain function is highly variable.
    • For some individuals, creatine supplementation results in a 25-30% increase in brain creatine levels. Those individuals are likely to experience brain health benefits.
    • For other individuals, creatine supplementation results in 2-5% increase in brain creatine levels. These individuals may not experience noticeable brain health benefits.
  • These reason for this variability in the effect of creatine supplementation is unknown at present.

This reminds me of my last decade (2002-2012) of cancer research at the University of North Carolina. At the beginning of the decade, here were certain cancer drugs that were considered unproven because their effectiveness was variable. They appeared to help some cancer patients, but were ineffective for others.

The we started to look at the genetic mutations that caused individual cancers. By the end of the decade we had discovered those drugs were amazingly effective for cancers with certain genetic backgrounds. Those drugs went from being “duds” to being “stars”.

Creatine supplementation for brain health is where those cancer drugs were in 2002. Until we can predict which individuals will experience a significant increase in brain creatine levels with supplementation, clinical studies will continue to be inconsistent, and the scientific community will continue to consider creatine supplementation for brain health to be “unproven”.

  • But the good news is that, with adequate hydration, creatine supplementation is safe. So, you can take it for its muscle benefits. And, if you also experience brain health benefits, consider it an added benefit.

And there are certain situations where even the medical profession often recommends creatine supplementation for brain health. For example:

  • Studies suggest that creatine supplementation may improve brain function for people with sleep deprivation, mild traumatic brain injury, cognitive decline, conditions that restrict blood flow to the brain, Alzheimer’s disease, and depression.
    • For example, it is often recommended for mild traumatic brain injury because the health consequences of untreated traumatic brain injury are severe and the risks of creatine supplementation are low.

Finally, the optimal dosage and duration of creatine supplementation for brain health benefits is unknown.

  • Most studies use 20 grams/day divided into two or three smaller doses.
  • But the effect of body weight on dosage recommendations has not been studied. People in the sports medicine field tell me that female gymnasts use significantly less creatine than male football players. If your body weight is low, you might want to aim for 10-15 grams/day.

Creatine Supplementation Cautions 

While the safety of creatine supplementation is well established, there are some cautions you should be aware of:

  • Creatinine, the breakdown product of creatine metabolism, puts some stress on the kidneys.
    • While this is not a problem if your kidneys are healthy, you should consult with your health professional about taking creatine if you have any indications of impaired kidney function.
    • Even if your kidneys are perfectly healthy, creatine supplementation may increase blood creatinine levels. If your health professional is using creatinine levels to measure kidney health, you should let them know that you are supplementing with creatine.
  • Adequate hydration (preferably with water) is important because creatine pulls water with it as it enters your muscle cells.
    • This plumps up your muscles, which is great if you are a body builder.
    • This dehydrates you, which can cause side effects like muscle cramps, headaches, nausea, stomach cramps, and diarrhea.
    • These side effects are usually transitory and can be avoided or reduced by adequate hydration. If symptoms continue despite adequate hydration, you should lower the dose or discontinue creatine supplementation.

The Bottom Line 

If you are interested in creatine to support any kind of high intensity, short duration activity, the data are clear. Creatine supplementation in the 5-20 gm/day range with adequate hydration is both safe and effective.

However, we are at the early stages of understanding the effects of creatine supplementation on brain health and cognitive function. Most of the results are promising, but preliminary.

I discussed two studies on creatine supplementation and brain health in this article. Here is a brief summary of their findings:

  • Creatine supplementation may improve brain function for people with sleep deprivation, mild traumatic brain injury, cognitive decline, conditions that restrict blood flow to the brain, Alzheimer’s disease, and depression).
    • Although the effectiveness of creatine supplementation on brain function is uncertain at present, many experts recommend it if you fall into one of the categories listed above because creatine supplementation has been shown to be safe by decades of sports medicine studies.
  • The effectiveness of creatine supplementation at increasing brain creatine levels and improving brain function is highly variable.
    • For some individuals, creatine supplementation results in a 25-30% increase in brain creatine levels. Those individuals are likely to experience brain health benefits.
    • For other individuals, creatine supplementation results in 2-5% increase in brain creatine levels. These individuals may not experience noticeable brain health benefits.
  • But the good news is that, with adequate hydration, creatine supplementation is safe. So, you can take it for its muscle benefits. And, if you also experience brain health benefits, consider it an added benefit.

For more information on this study, what it means for you, and cautions about using creatine supplements, read the article above.

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This information is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

 _____________________________________________________________________________

My posts and “Health Tips From the Professor” articles carefully avoid claims about any brand of supplement or manufacturer of supplements. However, I am often asked by representatives of supplement companies if they can share them with their customers.

My answer is, “Yes, as long as you share only the article without any additions or alterations. In particular, you should avoid adding any mention of your company or your company’s products. If you were to do that, you could be making what the FTC and FDA consider a “misleading health claim” that could result in legal action against you and the company you represent.

For more detail about FTC regulations for health claims, see this link.

https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/health-products-compliance-guidance 

_____________________________________________________________________________

About The Author 

Dr. Chaney has a BS in Chemistry from Duke University and a PhD in Biochemistry from UCLA. He is Professor Emeritus from the University of North Carolina where he taught biochemistry and nutrition to medical and dental students for 40 years.  Dr. Chaney won numerous teaching awards at UNC, including the Academy of Educators “Excellence in Teaching Lifetime Achievement Award”. Dr Chaney also ran an active cancer research program at UNC and published over 100 scientific articles and reviews in peer-reviewed scientific journals. In addition, he authored two chapters on nutrition in one of the leading Biochemistry textbooks for medical students.

Since retiring from the University of North Carolina, he has been writing a weekly health blog called “Health Tips From the Professor”. He has also written two best-selling books, “Slaying the Food Myths” and “Slaying the Supplement Myths”. And most recently he has created an online lifestyle change course, “Create Your Personal Health Zone”. For more information visit https://chaneyhealth.com.

For the past 53 years Dr. Chaney and his wife Suzanne have been helping people improve their health holistically through a combination of good diet, exercise, weight control and appropriate supplementation.

 

 

Should Athletes Be Taking Omega-3s?

Can Omega-3s Protect Your Brain?

Author: Dr. Stephen Chaney 

Contact sports like football and soccer can be an athlete’s ticket to fame and fortune. That is a powerful motivator. But many elite athletes in contact sports pay a terrible price after their playing days are over.

Repeated head trauma can lead to a condition called Chronic Trauma Encephalopathy or CTE. In CTE, a protein called Tau forms clumps that spread through the brain, killing brain cells. Eventually, this can lead to irrational behavior and/or early-onset Alzheimer’s, which is, indeed, a terrible price to pay for their brief moment in the spotlight.

The NCAA is aware of the damaging effects of repeated head trauma and are experimenting with rule changes and improvements to protective head gear to reduce it. But, given the pressures of college teams to win at all costs, it will be impossible to completely eliminate head trauma from contact sports.

So, it is important to ask, “What else we can do?” Several studies have suggested that omega-3s may mitigate the damaging effect of repeated head trauma. For example:

  • The omega-3s DHA and EPA are metabolized to molecules called resolvins and protectins, which protect brain tissue from oxidative stress and help restore damaged brain tissue.
  • DHA and EPA also reduce the inflammation associated with brain injury, so the brain can heal faster.
  • DHA and EPA boost the level of a protein called BDNF in the brain. It helps trigger the production of new brain cells, which also aids in the recovery from brain injury.
  • Finally, some medical clinics have reported that high dose omega-3s help speed the recovery from severe head trauma.
  • This is concerning because omega-3s are largely missing from the diet of college athletes.

This raises the question, “Should athletes be taking omega-3s?”omega 3 supplements

The kinds of studies mentioned above suggest that DHA and EPA might help protect athletes from the damaging effects of repeated head trauma, but it is difficult to prove:

  • If a patient comes into a clinic with severe brain trauma, the symptoms are obvious. And if omega-3s speed recovery it will become apparent in weeks or months. This effect is easy to measure.
  • On the other hand, the effects of repeated, minor head trauma on a highly trained athlete are often not apparent until decades later. Therefore, any protective effects of omega-3s would also not become apparent for decades. Clinical studies don’t last that long.

Because of this, current research focuses on markers of brain damage such as neurofilament light chain or Nf-L. Nf-L is a neuronal protein that is released into the bloodstream by dying neurons. It is widely considered to be an early marker for neurodegenerative diseases such as those seen in former college football players. Previous studies have shown:

  • Nf-L blood levels increase during the season for NCAA-level college football players.
  • College football players have a very low omega-3 index, a measure of omega-3 status.
  • DHA supplementation reduces Nf-L levels in college football players.

With this in mind, the authors of this study (JL Heileson et al, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition 18:65, 2021) looked at the effect of a high-dose, comprehensive omega-3 supplement on Nf-L levels in the blood of NCAA football players during the playing season.

How Was This Study Done?

clinical studyVolunteers from two geographically distinct NCAA football teams were recruited for this study. One team (n=31) was given a daily high-dose omega-3 supplement providing 2,000 mg of DHA, 560 mg of EPA, and 320 mg of DPA starting during pre-season (fall) practices and continuing through the entire season. Compliance with the supplement regimen was 93%.

Volunteers from the other team (n=35) received no supplements and served as a control.

Participants from both teams were advised which foods were high in omega-3s and were asked to limit servings to no more than 2 per week for the duration of the study.

Players were excluded from the study if they:

  • Were on long-term (>20 days) anti-inflammatory therapy.
  • Were using fish oil supplements.
  • Ate more than two servings of fish per week.
  • Were on medications to control blood pressure or blood lipid levels.

Blood samples were drawn 7 days before pre-season practice, at the end of pre-season practice, 3 times during the season, and at the end of the season (a total of 6 blood draws).

The blood samples were analyzed for Nf-L, a marker of brain injury, and Omega-3 Index, a measure of omega-3 status.

Should Athletes Be Taking Omega-3s?

As I stated above, compliance with the supplementation regimen was excellent (93%) and this was reflected in the blood levels of long-chain omega-3s. Between the first and last blood sample drawn:

  • DHA and EPA levels increased 2-fold.
  • DPA levels, on the other hand, decreased slightly.
    • This suggests that the beneficial effects of omega-3 supplementation were primarily due to DHA and EPA. I will discuss the implications of this below.
  • The omega-3 index increased from 4.3%, which is considered poor, to 7.4%, which is considered near optimal.

The effect of omega-3 supplementation on Nf-L levels was striking:

  • In the control team (no supplementation) Nf-L levels increased 1.5-fold during the pre-season practices and remained elevated throughout the regular season.
  • In the team receiving omega-3 supplementation there was no significant increase in Nf-L levels.

The authors of the study concluded, “These findings suggest a…neuroprotective effect of combined EPA+DPA+DHA omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in American-style football athletes.”

The authors went on to say, “Similar elevations of Nf-L have been reported with RHI [repeated head injuries] in other contact sport athletes. These data suggest that those other contact sports athletes may also benefit from omega-3 supplementation…”

So, let’s return to the original question, “Should athletes be taking omega-3s?” Here is my take on the study:

  • The conclusions of the authors are appropriately cautious. This study shows that omega-3 supplementation reduces an indicator of possible brain damage (Nf-L), but the actual symptoms of brain damage don’t appear for decades.
    • Therefore, this study suggests, but doesn’t prove, that omega-3 supplementation may reduce Chronic Trauma Encephalopathy (CTE) for athletes who competed in contact sports during their college years.
  • This study used an omega-3 supplement containing EPA, DHA, and DPA. It resulted in an increase in EPA and DHA levels, but not DPA levels. Thus, there is no evidence that the DPA portion of the supplement was needed. I recommend a supplement with a 4:1 ratio of DHA to EPA for brain health.
  • This study did not establish an optimal dose of omega-3s. Until more information is available, I would recommend around 2,000 mg of DHA and 500 mg of EPA for athletes in contact sports, but the optimal dose may be lower or higher.

Can Omega-3s Protect Your Brain?

If you are not a college athlete competing in contact sports (which would include most of us), you are probably wondering what this means for you. Here are my thoughts.

As Benjamin Franklin said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

  • You never know when you may suffer unexpected head trauma. It could be a car accident. It could be a fall. You might be playing a friendly game of softball and get hit in the head by a foul ball. You get the point.
  • And the best time to make sure you have enough omega-3s (specifically DHA + EPA) in your brain is before the trauma occurs.

But how much DHA + EPA is enough? This is where it gets confusing.

  • Recommendations range from 500 mg/day to 3,000 mg/day depending on whether the goal is to reduce death from heart disease, lower blood pressure, or lower triglycerides.
  • This study used 2,500 mg/day to reduce a marker of brain damage in college athletes, but we don’t know whether that is optimal.
  • Finally, these numbers are averages, and none of us are average. We all utilize omega-3s from supplements with different efficiencies.

My recommendation is to use the Omega-3 Index as a gauge. It tells us how much DHA + EPA we have actually accumulated in our tissues.

  • An Omega-3 Index of 8% is considered optimal for heart health, and this study suggests it might be optimal for brain health as well.
  • So, my recommendation is to get your Omega-3 Index measured at 6-month intervals until you have determined the amount of supplemental DHA + EPA you need to attain and maintain an 8% Omega-3 Index.
  • Based on this study, I would recommend a high-purity supplement with an ~4:1 ratio of DHA to EPA if your primary goal is brain health. But other studies suggest that an EPA to DHA ratio of 3:2 may be optimal for heart health.

In short:

  • While the evidence is not definitive, this study suggests that it might be prudent to have accumulated enough DHA and EPA in your neural tissue to help reduce the complications of unexpected brain trauma.
  • This study also suggests that you may wish to aim for an Omega-3 Index of 8%.
    • An Omega-3 Index of 8% likely has side benefits. There is also evidence that it may reduce the rate of cognitive decline as you age, help protect your heart, and reduce inflammation.
  • The ratio of DHA to EPA in the supplement you choose may be different for brain health and heart health. If you are equally interested in brain and heart health, just be sure your supplement provides both DHA and EPA.

The Bottom Line 

Repeated head injuries are a major concern for NCAA football players and college athletes in other contact sports. That’s because repeated head injuries during their playing years are associated with a degenerative brain condition called Chronic Trauma Encephalopathy or CTE, which can lead to irrational behavior and/or early-onset Alzheimer’s.

A recent study looked at the effect of a high-dose, comprehensive omega-3 supplement on Nf-L, a marker of brain injury, in NCAA football players during the playing season. Two teams were selected.

  • In the team receiving no omega-3s, Nf-L increased 1.5-fold during preseason practice and remained elevated throughout the playing season.
  • In the team receiving omega-3 supplementation there was no significant increase in Nf-L levels.

The authors of the study concluded, “These findings suggest a…neuroprotective effect of… omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in American-style football athletes.”

The authors went on to say, “Similar elevations of Nf-L have been reported with RHI [repeated head injuries] in other contact sport athletes. These data suggest that those other contact sports athletes may also benefit from omega-3 supplementation…”

For more information on this study and what it means for all of us who are not college athletes, read the article above.

These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This information is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.

 ____________________________________________________________________________

My posts and “Health Tips From the Professor” articles carefully avoid claims about any brand of supplement or manufacturer of supplements. However, I am often asked by representatives of supplement companies if they can share them with their customers.

My answer is, “Yes, as long as you share only the article without any additions or alterations. In particular, you should avoid adding any mention of your company or your company’s products. If you were to do that, you could be making what the FTC and FDA consider a “misleading health claim” that could result in legal action against you and the company you represent.

For more detail about FTC regulations for health claims, see this link.

https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/health-products-compliance-guidance

 

 

Health Tips From The Professor